Eight browser games that drill the exact things the certification exams actually test — lookalike-service traps, wrong defaults, and scope rules.
A Foundation card and an Expert card about the same service are different questions, not the same question worded more simply. Foundation asks what a consistency level controls. Expert asks which one you pick for a like-counter where ordering does not matter.
One giant hand-drawn diagram per topic, decision trees to a named service, and an "if the exam says ___, answer ___" cue-card table on every board.
Spaced repetition with SM-2 scheduling. Every card carries the one-sentence discriminator that decides between two lookalikes — that field is the whole point.
143 scenario items with the formats that actually hurt: multi-select, click-to-order sequencing, and the locked yes/no series you cannot go back through.
Real deployments against your own Azure subscription and GitHub org — az CLI, Bicep, Terraform, Actions with OIDC. Every lab has a teardown script so nothing bleeds cost.
It is early and I am collecting opinions before building the paid side. What would make you actually pay for this? What is missing? Which game is boring?
Send feedback